All
footnotes used must follow an acceptable form as indicated in The
Chicago Manual of Style (CMS), or in the
examples below. As long as a form is acceptable, it may vary
somewhat from these examples, but the important thing is that they
are consistent throughout. If any changes are made, be sure they are
made consistently.
The
following guidelines may vary from publisher to publisher, and they
may change some of the forms to fit their style manual before
publication, but if you prepare them as indicated below, they will be
acceptable and deemed professional, even if they have to be changed
somewhat later.
Note:
The examples below show note forms first, followed by bibliographic
forms for the same items.
- Books
- Herbert Schlossberg, Idols for Destruction (Nashville, Tenn.: Thomas Nelson, 1983),238.
(Note that 1. is used, rather than a raised or
superior 1. This is the style to follow both in footnotes and
endnotes. Superior numbers are needed only in the text.)
Schlossberg, Herbert. Idols
for Destruction. Nashville, Tenn.: Thomas
Nelson, 1983.
- Elisabeth Elliot, ed., The Journals of Jim Elliot (Old Tappan, N.J.: Revell, 1978), 356.
Elliot, Elisabeth, ed. The
Journals of Jim Elliot. Old Tappan, N.J.:
Revell, 1978.
- Rosemary Ruether and Rosemary Keller, Women and Religion in America: The Nineteenth Century, vol. 1 (San Francisco: Harper and Row, 1982), 131-35.
Ruether, Rosemary and Rosemary Keller. Women
and Religion in America: The
Nineteenth Century. Vol. 1.
San Francisco: Harper and Row, 1982.
- Thomas a Kempis, The Imitation of Christ, trans. E.M. Blaiklock (Nashville, Tenn.: Thomas Nelson, 1979), 46-47.
a
Kempis, Thomas. The Imitation of Christ,
trans. E. M. Blaiklock. Nashville,
Tenn.: Thomas Nelson, 1981. [alphabetize under K]