If
you write about other people, you need to be aware of the privacy
laws and what affect they have on such stories. Although we often
hear of celebrities who have sued for invasion of privacy, the most
ordinary citizen is protected by the same privacy laws that protect
the celebrity—protected from unauthorized use of their name,
likeness or personal history. The problem is the ongoing erosion of
and changes in those privacy laws.
I
would like to be able to give you a simple list of guidelines—a map
of sorts-- to carry you through this minefield, but unfortunately the
map is as full of holes as the minefield. In each case that comes
before the courts, it comes down to how the judge decides to
interpret privacy laws against the rights inherent in the first
Amendment.
The
rights of the individual will almost always win out when what is
published is very personal or intimate—and the purpose in
publishing it is wholly unworthy—or if what is written is obviously
inaccurate.
Generally,
the law says that “one who is part of a public scene may be
lawfully photographed as part of that scene,” but if the person is
being shown in a negative light within the scene, it could be an
invasion of their privacy.
Another
problem for the writer or photographer is if what they say or
photograph gives the reader a false impression of the subject. For
example, using the photo of a woman to illustrate someone else’s
story of indiscretions—giving the impression that she was the
guilty party.
Suits
for invasion of privacy are not all that common, and if a suit is
brought, the plaintiff must prove there was actual malice intended on
the part of the writer or photographer. So generally, if you use your
common sense, do your homework, always check your sources, and write
only what you know to be true, revealing identities only when
necessary, you won’t need to worry about being sued.
No comments:
Post a Comment